Exceptions will stop the program from executing further, so to avoid such condition, they need to be captured and handled separately. This process is called as Exception-Handling, in which the programmer handles the exception that can occur at the run time. Exceptions are handled at the block, level, i.
The exception will then be handled at the exception handling part of that block. After handling the exception, it is not possible to resend control back to the execution section of that block. Oracle has predefined some common exception. These exceptions have a unique exception name and error number. In code, we can directly use these predefined exception name to handle them. In the following example, you pass positive numbers and so get unwanted results:.
Instead, you must assign their values to local variables, then use the variables in the SQL statement, as shown in the following example:. Unhandled exceptions can also affect subprograms. An exception handler lets you recover from an otherwise fatal error before exiting a block. But when the handler completes, the block is terminated.
You cannot return to the current block from an exception handler. You can still handle an exception for a statement, then continue with the next statement.
Place the statement in its own sub-block with its own exception handlers. If an error occurs in the sub-block, a local handler can catch the exception. When the sub-block ends, the enclosing block continues to execute at the point where the sub-block ends. After an exception is raised, rather than abandon your transaction, you might want to retry it. The technique is:. Consider the example below. When the exception handler completes, the sub-block terminates, control transfers to the LOOP statement in the enclosing block, the sub-block starts executing again, and the transaction is retried.
Using one exception handler for a sequence of statements can mask the statement that caused an error:. Normally, this is not a problem. But, if the need arises, you can use a locator variable to track statement execution, as follows:. BEGIN sub-block begins Handling Exceptions Raised in Declarations Exceptions can be raised in declarations by faulty initialization expressions.
END; Handlers in the current block cannot catch the raised exception because an exception raised in a declaration propagates immediately to the enclosing block. Handling Exceptions Raised in Handlers Only one exception at a time can be active in the exception-handling part of a block or subprogram.
Continuing after an Exception Is Raised An exception handler lets you recover from an otherwise fatal error before exiting a block. END; You can still handle an exception for a statement, then continue with the next statement. Retrying a Transaction After an exception is raised, rather than abandon your transaction, you might want to retry it. The technique is: Encase the transaction in a sub-block. Place the sub-block inside a loop that repeats the transaction.
Before starting the transaction, mark a savepoint. If the transaction succeeds, commit, then exit from the loop. If the transaction fails, control transfers to the exception handler, where you roll back to the savepoint undoing any changes, then try to fix the problem. END; Normally, this is not a problem. All Rights Reserved. Book List. Master Index. Your program attempts an illegal cursor operation such as closing an unopened cursor.
Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Stack Gives Back Safety in numbers: crowdsourcing data on nefarious IP addresses. Featured on Meta. New post summary designs on greatest hits now, everywhere else eventually.
Linked 0. Related 3. I do not believe at the low level you would ever consider catching a when others and rolling back. You would let the exception propagate up to the top layer. If NO ONE catches it -- the statement all work performed by that statement, which is your plsql call in fact is automagically rolled back.
If someone at the top does catch it and "hides" it, they would have to rollback themselves if that is the right thing to do. If you have expert one on one Oracle, i wrote about this. I do not understand why you thought otherwise. I do not understand why you return a number in the procedure.
I will explain how I do things in a simple example and can you please tell me what problems do you see with it and how to correct it. FOR i IN June 29, - am UTC. I had no thoughts on your approach. I would not have that there --Print the save confirmation. HTML confirmation page I would let the caller handle all exceptions. Tom: I implemented your suggestions.
However I do not understand some of these: 1. Why you do not like to select a sequence from dual. When I do it this way, It will not run the insert function.
What is Web Service? I hear about it but do really understand what it is? July 02, - pm UTC. Does this mean less gaps in sequence value or no?
If he hits refresh on the browser it will do another insert into the table. Some users hit "refresh" without realizing it runs the API twice. Is not this transactional like you proposed? Which way is better? April 05, - pm UTC. So, just update it - but do so in a manner that does not suffer from the lost update problem make sure the record did not change between the time you read it out, made a decision to modify it, and wrote it back.
Don't query it to see if it exists to update - by the time you go to update it, it might not exist anymore. Tom: What is the best way to do this. I have a client program http client or web page that sends employee info to the database for update. My stored procedure should perform the update and send a confirmation to the client that "Updates Saved" or "Updates Failed".
My thinking is as follows: 1. If person exists, then do update emp set Are these the steps you would do. Can you show a small sample on how you would do it and what exceptions you will be checking for for this kind of update. August 22, - am UTC. Actually, you need to do much better than that. You need to perform lost update detection. We must presume in order to update , you read the data out at some point Actually, it is a problem in all multiuser computer environments.
Simply put, a lost update occurs when the following events occur, in the order presented here: 1. A transaction in Session1 retrieves queries a row of data into local memory and displays it to an end user, User1. Another transaction in Session2 retrieves that same row, but displays the data to a different end user, User2.
User1, using the application, modifies that row and has the application update the database and commit. User2 modifies that row also, and has the application update the database and commit. Consider, for example, an employee update screen that allows a user to change an address, work number, and so on. The application itself is very simple: a small search screen to generate a list of employees and then the ability to drill down into the details of each employee. This should be a piece of cake.
Then an end user User1 navigates to the details screen, changes an address on the screen, clicks Save, and receives confirmation that the update was successful. Fine, except that when User1 checks the record the next day to send out a tax form, the old address is still listed.
How could that have happened? Unfortunately, it can happen all too easily. Then after User2 queried the data, User1 performed her update, received confirmation, and even requeried to see the change for herself.
They simply needed to be working on the record at about the same time. Many tools, such as Oracle Forms and HTML DB, transparently protect you from this behavior by ensuring the record is unchanged from the time you query it and locked before you make any changes to it, but many others such as a handwritten Visual Basic or Java program do not.
What the tools that protect you do behind the scenes, or what the developers must do themselves, is use one of two types of locking strategies: pessimistic or optimistic.
0コメント